logo

Need of unitary values

This topic is in direct continuation with the earlier topic of “Unitary values and finalities of dimensions” …

 

Here we shall discuss macrocosmic need for manifestation of unitary values of dimensions (units of dimensions) …

Macrocosmic creation needs a vast variety of differences to sustain itself till eternity and this is because of the fact that if diversity is not there, then there won’t even be any parts of allness and in such a case, it would be just one microcosm, which also would be the macrocosm … Thus it is due to this reason that the macrocosmic creation intrinsically pluralistic …

So to ensure the presence of diversity, an intrinsically pluralistic state is what macrocosmic creation adopts for itself … And to eternally maintain the diversity, vast number of ever-different microcosms (and also different types of microcosm’s) are required to get originated within the macrocosmic creation and that too in such a state where no microcosm is having an exact sameness to any other microcosm that ever was during history of the macrocosmic creation … This also leads to a state where an eternal changefulness of all that is originated and resting within the macrocosmic creation, remains as the only macrocosmic constant …

 

19-AA … Stagnation due to sameness … The need of individualities …

Due to the requirement of ensuring diversities (as were discussed above) the macrocosmic creation never allows a state of sameness of any microcosm to any other microcosm that ever was during history of the macrocosmic creation … And due to this requirement, sameness of any now to any earlier nowness that was of any earlier microcosm, is also considered as stagnation from the macrocosmic point of view …

Thus, if any microcosm arrives at a state of sameness to any other microcosm that ever was during the history of the macrocosmic creation, then this is also deemed to be stagnation from the macrocosmic point of view …

After this stagnation arrives, then either the microcosm changes itself or amends its ways to ensure its own non sameness as was discussed above, or it shall eventually remain with no choice but to enter the process of its own cyclic dissolution …

Thus all those systems which claim that they need to do such and such things to return back to the conditions as were during such and such greater-ones time (i.e. they claim or try to return back to the conditions as were during the time when a high personage that they believe in, was on this world) are actually living in a fool’s paradise because the process of return back to such a condition would only be deemed to be a stagnation from the macrocosmic point of view and since the reason for such a stagnation would only be deemed as willful misconduct (or willfully causing a stagnation) as far as this discussion stands, so that stagnation would only end up leading to a state of inner chaos (within followers of such deviated concepts) which as times progress, would also spill outwards (into the outer world system) … And after this stage also, if that aspirants (or group of aspirants) don’t change their ways of working in the world, then a stage would eventually arrive where that path of practice (or system) only would get dissoluted or dissipated or destroyed within that world … History of human civilizations is already holding many proofs of whatever is told here …

Thus basis above discussions … No earlier state, condition, system etc can ever be brought back in the same state that “was of it or was of any other microcosm” during any earlier time span and this itself is because such a condition of sameness would only be deemed to be a stagnation from the macrocosmic point of view and thus it would lead to all sorts of inner and outer chaos within all ways and walks of life of such aspirants, societies and lands who work towards such ends …

This itself is because of the fact that such things are never allowed by the macrocosmic creation … Thus during history of any world where animated-conscious-knowledgeable-active microcosm’s reside, all systems, their texts, their propagators and adherents who claim of suchness, have only led to chaos of one or another type and that too where this chaos had manifested within one or another way or walk of life of such adherents which in had made such adherents to be naught but instruments of chaos on that world … This is also an absolute fact as nature never allows a state of sameness of any now of herself (or of her any microcosm) to her (or her any microcosm’s) nowness that ever was during the history of the macrocosmic creation … And those systems or their adherents who have tried to manifest suchness of sameness even after repeated subtle and gross warnings from nature (like diseases, shakings of earth, manmade or natural or divine destructions, etc, etc), have ultimately been dissipated from that world … This is also what leads to the fact that an eternal change remains as the eternal macrocosmic constant

 

19-BB … Need of unitary values … Ensuring pluralistic monism …

Thus to ensure this diversity, an intrinsic pluralism remains the only choice for the macrocosmic creation and yet because these individualities which rest within the pluralism of the macrocosmic creation are also intrinsic and unbroken parts of the same macrocosmic creation, so the essential monism is also maintained within the macrocosmic creation … All individualities are like individual cells and all individual corpuses are like organs that make your own body and none of these individualities or corpuses can ever afford a sameness of their any now to any other nowness that ever was of any other individual state and yet be able to survive through the eternity as is of the Maker’s Makings … Thus all forms and non forms of individualisms eventually fail and this is why there has never be an individualistic system which did not hold theories of an end of their time … And since this end time itself is through a chaos, so this fact is also stated in all texts of individualistic (or monotheistic) lore’s …

And since neither the cells nor the organs stay in their eternal sameness, so is the state of any of the individualities which rest within the macrocosmic creation …

As also, since this sameness of application of macrocosmic laws is eternally there on each microcosm, so the same discussions are also applicable to supra-animate microcosmic states (like gods of systems) and also upon supra-inanimate microcosm like religious lore’s …

As are the laws applicable to any microcosm, so are the same laws applicable to any other microcosm because the macrocosmic creation never given preference to any microcosm that rests within her envelope (including your heavens and gods or Satan’s) … All that rests or works within the vast purviews of the Maker’s Makings, has always had to follow whatever is told here and those who don’t, always enter into their end times once they have not paid a sufficient heed to warnings which macrocosmic nature always renders prior to making such aspects (or microcosm’s or systems) enter the stage of their final dissipation (from a world) …

Even when each microcosm is different from another, which in turn maintains the intrinsic pluralism of the macrocosmic creation, yet they all are eternally in oneness to the macrocosmic creation within which they reside … This ensures the intrinsic pluralism and simultaneously ensures the essential monism of the macrocosmic creation … Thus even when Mother Nature is intrinsically pluralistic, yet she essentially remains as a monistic entity …

 

19-CC … Pluralistic monism … Unity of diversity … Unity of unitary values …

Change is the only eternal constant within the macrocosmic creation and her each part … And since whet is told here is a fact, so as times progress adherents of modern science shall also know that all their constants (of physics, etc) are also eternally changeful and where this change is also dependent upon the unitary values of time (i.e. dependent upon the ever changeful state of the precession cycle or in other words, the human age cycle) that is applicable at that time …

Whenever these unitary values change, the constants of modern science (Physics etc) shall also be found to be changeful and so would be changed the observed speed of light at such times of observation …

To avoid this nonsense of ever changefulness of calculations and constants, all the Vedic sages, commencing from Manu Maharaaj (i.e. father of Man or Manushya), who itself is the first Man of this age of Manu (or Manvantar) and who also is addressed as the Aadum or Adam (or father of Aadmi or the first Man) had used the middle time units of precession cycles (in all their calculations) …

As was discussed earlier, even when the macrocosmic creation is intrinsically pluralistic, yet she is essentially monist as all these individualities are her own partless-parts only …

Due to this reason, all individual parts of allness are resting within allness (i.e. everything is enveloped by allness), moving towards allness (evolving into an ever higher oneness to allness) and are also pervaded by the same allness itself (and thus are holding the same eternity of existence, as is of allness of Maker’s Makings itself) …

Due to this realization, it is very clearly known that the Maker never made any non-eternal microcosm and this was even when these originated microcosm’s are initially resting within a cyclic mode of existence only … Thus is realized the supreme genius of Maker’s Makings …

And the primary dimensions of allness being of time, space, direction and state, so all parts of allness only rest within the unitary values of these dimensions and just as these dimensions are applicable to those parts as per their own evolutionary standings … And as these parts evolve, they keep entering into an ever higher inner subtlety and thus keep entering into ever higher unitary values of these four primary dimensions of the macrocosmic creation …

And finally all these parts of allness only end up in the finalities of these four primary dimensions … These finalities of dimensions are “eternity of time, infinity of space, omni-directionality of directions and omnipresence of state” …

When any microcosmic part begins resting within (or arrives at) the finalities of these dimensions, then it also ceases to be an individual-duality (i.e. individuality and individual-corpus) that it earlier was … This is the stage of evolving past the earlier condition of being a microcosm and thus entering a state of being “A” macrocosm who rests  within “THE” macrocosm and where both these are one and the same in their ultimate reality (because in such a stage, both these are inseparable from each other, which itself is due to being homogenously inter-mixed to each other) …

 

19-DD … Unitary values … Diversity and conscious, knowledge and activity principles …

Due to above discussed reasons for maintenance of diversities, the macrocosmic creation also needs countless numbers of ever changeful individualities so as to maintain her intrinsically pluralistic nature and this eternal changefulness of all parts of allness (i.e. all microcosm’s) itself leads to the eternity of evolution of all that is … And yet she stays as the same macrocosmic creation irrespective of the parts that she manifests herself in, which in turn makes her an essentially monist entity …

Her pluralism is due to her activity principle (Kriya Siddhant) and her monism is due to the conscious principle (Chetan Siddhant) of the Absolute-being that gets injected into her (as the absolute being pervades and envelopes her) and this unity of the activity and conscious principles is maintained by the Knowledge principle (Jnana Siddhant) which as such is none other than being knowledge of allness as it is a neutral principle that joins the two earlier stated principles (i.e. activity principle and conscious principle) …

Thus unless knowledge relates to allness and her each part, that knowledge cannot be an instrument of manifestation of an inner-calm (within the aspirants of any path) and due to this reason, that knowledge also cannot lead to an outer-peace within the world …

And because knowledge is only that which relates to allness and her each part, so knowledge is only that which stays neutral to all individualities and individual corpuses that rest within the macrocosmic creation …

Thus that knowledge which is neutral to allness and her each part, can only be based upon macro-equanimity (or equanimity towards allness and her each part or Sarva Samta) … Thus basis this discussion, knowledge is not knowledge unless it holds the essential teaching of “Sarva Samta (macro-equanimity) within it and also relates to Sarva Samta as its own intrinsic innermost nature …

That knowledge which does not relate to our current discussion eventually becomes based upon individualism of sorts and thus turns that knowledge system (and its adherents) into a state of being instrument of ensuring a continuous chaos which also keeps cyclically manifesting across all ways and walks of life of humanity … This is also an absolute fact and due to this reason no form of individualism has ever been capable of ensuring a long lasting peace within any of the worlds of the entire macrocosmic creation …

And this world has also been no different from the time when individualism and its individualistic knowledge systems had entered this world system, about nine millenniums ago as per the Kaalchakra calculations which would be discussed at a later stage of this topic …

 

Proceeding further …

And to ensure all above is naturally (automatically) maintained, unitary values of vast hierarchies are needed within the Maker’s Makings … And also, since one unitary value is of each microcosm and since no unitary value can ever be the same to any other unitary value that ever was of any other microcosm, so this is what lead to the eternal changeful and thus non sameness of these unitary values of dimensions …

And since the entirety of macrocosmic creation and her each microcosm only rests within the unitary values of the four primary dimensions (of time, state, direction and state) as are applicable to them (as per the current evolutionary standing within the macrocosmic hierarchies) so all above also ensures the need of every differences between unitary values and this requirement also ensures an ever changeful nature of these unitary values …

Thus was the discussion on need of unitary values and their ever changeful natures … Above facts were also told in Buddhist lore’s as follows …

A thousand monks … A thousand religions

Or in simple words …

A thousand sages … A thousand ways of life … To reach the same truth

And as a matter of fact, above statement also stands in line with what was told within the much-much earlier Vedic lore and as follows …

Ekam-Sat Viprah Bahuda Vadanti

Which means …

Truth is one but sages call it by different names

Above statement also means …

The truth is one, but sages walk into it through different paths (ways of life)

 

Above statements denote the ever changeful pluralistic nature of Dharma or way of life and this always comes to fore whenever newer aspirants become evolved sages during any future … This is what ensures a presence of intrinsic pluralism …

And the same Buddhist and Vedic lore also refers to essential monism within above statement itself, as Dharma in fact is one and the same Sanatan Tattva (eternal principle) … This ensures an essential monism …

When a system becomes rooted in intrinsic pluralism and essential monism of the Maker’s Makings, then that system automatically becomes a part of Sanatan Vedic Arya Dharma (as Intrinsic pluralism originally is of Sanatan Dharma or Hinduism itself) … Thus I really do not think of Buddhism as any different from Sanatan Dharma and this fact is what the writers of Indian constitution also saw when they had defined the word “Hindu” within the Indian constitution …

All this can only be possible due to differences and eternal changes of unitary values of dimensions … And as these dimensions change, then the directions of ways of life also need a change which as such leads to a newer knowledge system to get manifested upon that world …

But during a Guru Yuga since the ways of life are related to Pluralistic monism, so the knowledge which needs to be activated upon that world can only be of Sanatan Vedic Arya Dharma (Vedas) …

 

Continues …

Share

Published by

The Little Student

Irrespective of what may be apparent to any aspirant of now or ever, within the current transmigrated incarnation I remain as a little student of the Absolute.

Comments are closed.